Raw: [The state EV taxation landscape reflects the evolving transportation sector and the pressing need to address both fiscal gaps in road funding and environmental concerns.]
Skip to content
U.S. states fund most of their road and infrastructure budgets with revenues from gasoline taxes. The historical rationale behind this is intuitive. The more people use public roads, the more gasoline they consume, making the gas taxA gas tax is commonly used to describe the variety of taxes levied on gasoline at both the federal and state levels, to provide funds for highway repair and maintenance, as well as for other government infrastructure projects. These taxes are levied in a few ways, including per-gallon excise taxes, excise taxes imposed on wholesalers, and general sales taxes that apply to the purchase of gasoline.
a well-designed user feeA user fee is a charge imposed by the government for the primary purpose of covering the cost of providing a service, directly raising funds from the people who benefit from the particular public good or service being provided.
A user fee is not a tax, though some taxes may be labeled as user fees or closely resemble them.

The gas taxA tax is a mandatory payment or charge collected by local, state, and national governments from individuals or businesses to cover the costs of general government services, goods, and activities.
is often levied as a specific tax per gallon. While the commodity price of oil can fluctuate dramatically, the volume basis for the tax and citizens’ general dependence on gas for transportation have made the gas tax a stable source for funding roads. Gas taxes also serve as a disincentive to drive, decreasing both traffic congestion and pollution on the margin.
As the market share of electric vehicles (EVs) on the road grows, however, the gas tax’s ability to fund road projects and decrease traffic congestion erodes. Both federal and state real tax revenue per vehicle mile traveled has been on a steady decline for decades, creating a fiscal gap for road expenditures even as the demand for road infrastructure improvements has grown.
EVs produce lower emissions than traditional combustible-engine vehicles. Combining the fiscal gap with a desire to incentivize lower-emission vehicles, states have responded with a variety of tax policies.
The following map depicts states’ different approaches to incentivizing EV adoption and the imposition of higher registration fees for EV ownership.
Residents of all states are eligible to receive a federal tax credit of $7,500 for qualified EV purchases. Nineteen states offer an additional incentive beyond the federal credit ranging from a $1,000 incentive in Alaska and Delaware to a $7,500 credit in California, Connecticut, and Maine.
Contrary to a tax incentive, 24 states impose a higher annual vehicle registration fee for EVs and some hybrid vehicles to help offset forgone gas tax revenue. These fees range from $50 in Hawaii and South Dakota to $200 in Ohio, West Virginia, and Wyoming. 
Five states offer both an incentive for the purchase of an EV and impose a higher registration fee for EVs than for combustible-engine vehicles. The table below summarizes details about these policies.
Another response by states to backfill reductions in gas tax collections has been to implement a tax on EV charging stations. Six recent state laws targeting EV charging stations include the following:
Georgia will require stations to track kilowatt-hour usage and collect a tax for every 11 kilowatt-hours (effective January 2025).
Iowa imposes a $0.026 per kilowatt-hour tax on public EV charging stations (effective July 2023).
Kentucky will impose a tax of $0.03 per kilowatt hour on electric vehicle power distributed by an electric power dealer (effective January 2024).
Montana imposes a tax of $0.03 per kilowatt hour or its equivalent on electric current from public electric vehicle charging stations (effective July 2023). Public charging stations already in operation have until July 2025 to install meters to collect the tax. To relieve the tax burden on in-state electric vehicle owners, B. 55 reduces electric vehicle registration fees by 30 percent starting in 2028.
Oklahoma will implement an electric vehicle charging tax (effective November 1, 2023).
Utah imposes a tax on retail sales of electric current from electric vehicle charging stations (enacted March 2023).
Higher registration fees and EV charging station taxes are an attempt to better connect vehicle miles traveled (VMT) to transportation and road funding, yet in some instances, they are implemented in conflict with policies aimed at increasing EV adoption. A simpler transportation policy solution would be a VMT tax.
A VMT tax is levied on the number of miles traveled by an individual vehicle. While there are privacy concerns with the administration of the tax, it could directly link the miles traveled to public road and infrastructure spending. 
Two pieces of federal legislation—the Surface Transportation System Funding Alternatives Program (2015) and the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (2021)—provided funding for states to run VMT pilot programs. Utah already has, and Hawaii will enact (effective July 2025), an annual per-mile road usage charge for EVs in lieu of the EV registration fee.
The state EV taxation landscape reflects the evolving transportation sector and the pressing need to address both fiscal gaps in road funding and environmental concerns. As the EV market continues to evolve and technology advances, it’s likely that these tax policies will also adapt.
State Electric Vehicle Tax Credits and Registration Fees, in US Dollars
StateEV Purchase Tax CreditAdditional EV Annual Registration FeeAdditional Hybrid Annual Registration Fee
Alabama0200100
Alaska1,00000
Arizona000
Arkansas020050-100 (a)
California750-7,5001080
Colorado500051.880
Connecticut750-7,50000
Delaware1,000-2,500 (b)00
Florida0 (c)00
Georgia0213.70
Hawaii0500
Idaho014075
Illinois4,000 (b)1000
Indiana015050
Iowa01300
Kansasup to 2,40060-7020-30
Kentucky012060
Louisiana010060 (d)
MaineUp to 7,500 (e)00
Maryland3,000 (f)00
MassachusettsUp to 3,50000
Michigan014552.5 (d)
Minnesota0 (g)750
Mississippi(c)15075
Missouri010552.5
Montana000
Nebraska0750
Nevada0 (c)00
New Hampshire0 (c)00
New JerseyUp to 4,000 (b) (h)00
New Mexico000
New YorkUp to 2,00000
North Carolina0140.2538.75
North Dakota012050
Ohio0200200
OklahomaUp to 5,50011082
OregonUp to 5,000 (b) (e)76-910
PennsylvaniaUp to 3,00000
Rhode IslandUp to 2,50000
South Carolina060 (i)30 (i)
South Dakota0500
Tennessee01000
Texas000
Utah0130.25 (j)56.5 (j)
VermontUp to 4,00000
Virginia2,500120 (k)0
Washington0 (l)15075
West Virginia0200100
Wisconsin010075 (d)
Wyoming02000
Notes:
(a) There is a $50 fee for standard hybrid, $100 fee for plug-in hybrid.
(b) Offers a rebate, not credit.
(c) There are local credits and/or rebates
(d) For plug-in hybrid vehicles only
(e) Varies by income level
(f) For purchase price under $50,000.
(g) The state offers an E-Zpass incentive (one time credit of $250 for full electric and $125 for plug-in hybrids)
(h) The EV purchase is exempt from sales tax. The rebate is $25 per mile of EPA-rated all-electric range up to $4000.
(i) Biennial supplmental license fees of $120 and $60, respectively.
(j) Instead of the EV fee, users can pay a road usage fee of 1 cent per mile driven.
(k) Fee is a function of average number of passenger vehicle miles driven in state
(l) Purchase is exempt from sales tax.
Source: U.S. News and World Report, State Statutes
 
Stay informed on the tax policies impacting you.Subscribe to get insights from our trusted experts delivered straight to your inbox.
Subscribe
Share
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Email
Related Articles
ResearchOctober 25, 2022September 13, 2023
2023 State Business Tax Climate IndexWhile there are many ways to show how much is collected in taxes by state governments, our Index is designed to show how well states structure their tax systems by focusing on the how more than the how much in recognition of the fact that there are better and worse ways to raise revenue.
ResearchOctober 4, 2022July 27, 2023
Economic Implications of an Alaska Income Tax or Its AlternativesAlaska policymakers are understandably concerned about the long-term viability of the state’s overwhelming reliance on the oil and gas industry for revenue, but the state’s unique economy and geography, and low population density make some of the “traditional” taxes less efficient than they might be elsewhere.
DataSeptember 27, 2022July 25, 2023
Combined Federal and State Corporate Income Tax Rates in 2022When examining tax burdens on businesses, it is important to consider both federal and state corporate taxes. Corporate taxes are one of the most economically damaging ways to raise revenue and are a promising area of reform for states to increase competitiveness and promote economic growth, benefiting both companies and workers.
TopicsBusiness TaxesEnvironmental, Energy, and Transportation TaxesIndividual and Consumption TaxesOil and Gas Taxes
TagsTags:Revenue StabilityVehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Tax
LocationsLocations:AlabamaAlaskaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareFloridaGeorgiaHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasThe District of ColumbiaUnited StatesUtahVermontVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyoming
Authors
Benjamin Jaros
ExpertAdam HofferDirector of Excise Tax Policy
Stay informed on the tax policies impacting you.
Subscribe
About
Since 1937, our principled research, insightful analysis, and engaged experts have informed smarter tax policy in the U.S. and internationally. For over 80 years, our mission has remained the same: to improve lives through tax policies that lead to greater economic growth and opportunity.
Donate
As a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, we depend on the generosity of individuals like you.
Careers
Contact Us
Tax Foundation
1325 G St NW, Suite 950
Washington, DC 20005
Copyright Tax Foundation 2023
Copyright Notice
Privacy Policy

By Support