Raw: [According to the corporate tax component of the 2023 International Tax Competitiveness Index, Latvia and Estonia have the best corporate tax systems in the OECD.]
Skip to content
On October 19, we released the International TaxA tax is a mandatory payment or charge collected by local, state, and national governments from individuals or businesses to cover the costs of general government services, goods, and activities.
Competitiveness Index 2023, a study that measures and compares the competitiveness and neutrality of all 38 Organisation for Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries’ tax systems. In the coming weeks, we will illustrate how European OECD countries rank on each of the five components of the Index: corporate income taxA corporate income tax (CIT) is levied by federal and state governments on business profits. Many companies are not subject to the CIT because they are taxed as pass-through businesses, with income reportable under the individual income tax.
es, individual taxes, consumption taxA consumption tax is typically levied on the purchase of goods or services and is paid directly or indirectly by the consumer in the form of retail sales taxes, excise taxes, tariffs, value-added taxes (VAT), or an income tax where all savings is tax-deductible.
es, property taxA property tax is primarily levied on immovable property like land and buildings, as well as on tangible personal property that is movable, like vehicles and equipment. Property taxes are the single largest source of state and local revenue in the U.S. and help fund schools, roads, police, and other services.
es, and cross-border rules. Today, we look at how European countries’ corporate income tax systems compare within the OECD.
Unlike other studies that compare tax burdens, the Index measures how well a country structures its tax code. A tax code that is competitive and neutral promotes sustainable economic growth and investment and raises revenue for government priorities with minimal distortions. Our corporate income tax component scores countries not only on their corporate tax rates but also on how they handle net operating losses, capital allowanceA capital allowance is the amount of capital investment costs, or money directed towards a company’s long-term growth, a business can deduct each year from its revenue via depreciation. These are also sometimes referred to as depreciation allowances.
s, inventory valuation, and allowances for corporate equity; whether and to what extent distortionary patent boxA patent box—also referred to as intellectual property (IP) regime—taxes business income earned from IP at a rate below the statutory corporate income tax rate, aiming to encourage local research and development. Many patent boxes around the world have undergone substantial reforms due to profit shifting concerns.
es and research and development (R&D) tax incentives are granted; the application of digital services taxes; and the complexity of the corporate income tax.
Click here to see an interactive version of OECD countries’ corporate tax rankings, then click on your country for more information about its tax system’s strengths and weaknesses.
Latvia and Estonia have the best corporate tax systems in the OECD. Both countries have a cash-flow tax on business profits. This means that profits only get taxed when they are distributed to shareholders. If a business decides to retain or reinvest its profits instead of paying dividends to shareholders, there is no tax on such profits.
In contrast, Portugal has the least competitive and neutral corporate income tax system in Europe (Colombia ranks the lowest in the OECD). At 31.5 percent, Portugal levies one of the highest combined corporate tax rates on business profits, including multiple surtaxA surtax is an additional tax levied on top of an already existing business or individual tax and can have a flat or progressive rate structure. Surtaxes are typically enacted to fund a specific program or initiative, whereas revenue from broader-based taxes, like the individual income tax, typically cover a multitude of programs and services.
es. Only limited net operating losses can be carried forward and carried back; purchases of machinery, buildings, and intangibles cannot be fully expensed.
To see whether your country’s corporate tax rank has improved in recent years, check out the table below. To learn more about how we determined these rankings, read our full methodology here.
Comparing Corporate Tax Systems in the OECD, 2023Corporate Tax Component Rankings on the International Tax Competitiveness Index between 2020 and 2023 (for all OECD countries)
Country2023 Rank2022 RankChange from 2022 to 20232021 Rank
Australia3230-230
Austria2023322
Belgium1514-114
Canada2427326
Chile3512-2318
Colombia3838035
Costa Rica3637137
Czech Republic6606
Denmark1718117
Estonia2202
Finland9909
France3435136
Germany3132132
Greece1919016
Hungary4405
Iceland1217515
Ireland5504
Israel1316312
Italy2125427
Japan3033331
Korea2629329
Latvia1101
Lithuania3303
Luxembourg2324124
Mexico2728128
Netherlands2526125
New Zealand2931233
Norway1415113
Poland1613-311
Portugal3736-138
Slovak Republic1821320
Slovenia7707
Spain3334134
Sweden8808
Switzerland1010010
Turkey1120923
United Kingdom2811-1719
United States2222021
Note: The map reflects the rankings of all 38 OECD countries.
Source: Tax Foundation, 2023 International Tax Competitiveness Index
Stay informed on the tax policies impacting you.Subscribe to get insights from our trusted experts delivered straight to your inbox.
Subscribe
Share
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Email
Related Articles
ResearchOctober 17, 2023October 16, 2023
Anti-Avoidance Policies in a Pillar Two WorldThe global minimum tax agreement known as Pillar Two is intended to curb profit shifting. However, OECD countries already have a variety of mechanisms in place that seek to prevent base erosion and profit shifting by multinational corporations.
BlogSeptember 12, 2023October 5, 2023
The Tax Policy Implications of the Spanish Elections at the Regional, National, and European LevelsThe Spanish election results are moving the country away from pro-growth tax reforms while launching the government’s tax agenda, and the agenda of the Spanish presidency of the Council of the European Union, into uncertainty.
BlogMarch 31, 2023July 24, 2023
Shrinking Revenue from Sin Taxes: A Small Price to Pay for Healthier BehaviourYounger and healthier Brits have created a $17.1 billion budget hole by smoking and drinking less. Yet, despite this resounding piece of positive news, some see any decline in tax revenues as a public finance crisis. Excise taxes target a tax base that is intended to shrink. Less consumption is a stated goal of the policy.
TopicsBusiness Tax Compliance and ComplexityBusiness TaxesCorporate Income TaxesCost RecoveryDataEuropean Union (EU)Tax Proposals, Comparisons, and the Economy
TagsTags:Digital TaxationNet Operating Losses (NOLs)OECDPatent BoxResearch and Development (R&D)
LocationsLocations:AustriaBelgiumColombiaCosta RicaCzech RepublicDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIcelandIrelandItalyLatviaLithuaniaLuxembourgMexicoNetherlandsNorwayPolandPortugalSlovak RepublicSloveniaSpainSwedenSwitzerlandTurkeyUnited Kingdom
Authors
ExpertAlex MengdenGlobal Policy Analyst
Stay informed on the tax policies impacting you.
Subscribe
About
Since 1937, our principled research, insightful analysis, and engaged experts have informed smarter tax policy in the U.S. and internationally. For over 80 years, our mission has remained the same: to improve lives through tax policies that lead to greater economic growth and opportunity.
Donate
As a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, we depend on the generosity of individuals like you.
Careers
Contact Us
Tax Foundation
1325 G St NW, Suite 950
Washington, DC 20005
Copyright Tax Foundation 2023
Copyright Notice
Privacy Policy
