Raw: [Legal sports betting has grown rapidly since the Supreme Court granted states the ability to establish online sports betting markets in Murphy vs. NCAA in 2018.]
Skip to content
U.S.
Europe
EN
Subscribe
Donate
Research
Research Areas
Federal TaxState TaxGlobal TaxEU Tax
All ResearchMeet Our Experts
Featured Projects
Tariff TrackerFAQ: One Big Beautiful Bill ActTax CalculatorGrowth and Opportunity Tax PlanFederal Tax ModelingState Reforms for Mobility and ModernizationState Tax Competitiveness IndexInternational Tax Competitiveness IndexEuropean Tax Policy Scorecard
Featured Issues
Tariffs & TradeOne Big Beautiful Bill ActProperty TaxesGlobal Tax DealDebt & DeficitsCost RecoveryTaxes on Savers & InvestorsState Tax Trends
Latest Research
Trump Tariffs: Tracking the Economic Impact of the Trump Trade War42 min read
Experts Data
Data Areas
Federal TaxState TaxGlobal TaxEU Tax
All DataMeet Our Experts
Featured Projects
Facts & Figures: How Does Your State Compare?Federal Income Tax BracketsWho Pays Federal Income TaxesTCJA Tax CalculatorState and Local Tax BurdensCorporate Tax Rates Around the WorldSources of Government Revenue in the OECD
Featured Issues
State Data ExplorerCountry Data ExplorerState Tax MapsEuropean Tax Maps
Latest Data
Windfall Profits Taxes in Europe, 20256 min read
Blog & Commentary
Tax Policy BlogSee All TestimonySee All Op-edsThe Deduction PodcastMeet Our Experts
Latest Blog Post
Fiscal Forum: Future of the EU Tax Mix with Dr. Eva Eberhartinger8 min read
Latest Testimony
Response to OECD Consultation on BEPS 1.0
Latest Op-ed
Side-by-Side Pillar Two Deal a Good Start Toward Tax Simplicity
Education
Tax Terms GlossaryExplainer VideosThe Short Form BlogOur Principles
PrimersLegislative Courses
Tax Foundation UniversityState Tax Policy Boot Camp
Featured Resources
The Three Basic Tax TypesNot All Taxes Are Created EqualHistory of Taxes10 Common Tax Myths, DebunkedA Carbon Tax, ExplainedCommon Tax Questions, Answered
Featured Term
Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC)
Events About Us
About UsOur PrinciplesContact Us
Staff
Meet Our TeamMeet Our ExpertsMeet Our Board
Careers
Job OpeningsInternships
Support Our Work
Donate TodayWays to GiveDonor FAQPlanned Giving
Start typing to search…
Home • Data • State Taxes • Online Sports Betting Taxes by State, 2025
See previous versions of this postOnline Sports Betting Taxes by State, 2025September 16, 2025September 15, 20256 min readBy: Adam Hoffer, Jacob Macumber-Rosin
Print
Table of Contents
Legal sports betting has grown rapidly since the 2018 Supreme Court decision Murphy v. NCAA recognized the federal prohibition as unlawful, enabling states to establish legal markets. Under the previous prohibition, consumers could only bet legally in a few states, but there is now some form of legal sports betting in 40 states and the District of Columbia.
Across these states, sports betting markets vary substantially. States levy a range of different taxA tax is a mandatory payment or charge collected by local, state, and national governments from individuals or businesses to cover the costs of general government services, goods, and activities. rates and structures, sometimes differentiating between online wagers and brick-and-mortar wagers, and access to legal sports betting can be strictly limited.
While 40 states have legalized sports wagering in some form, consumers only have statewide access to online sports betting platforms in 30 states and the District of Columbia. The highest tax rates are levied in New Hampshire, New York, Oregon, and Rhode Island at 51 percent of sportsbook revenues. Nevada and Iowa levy the lowest tax rates at 6.75 percent.
Most states levy an ad valorem tax on the revenues of sportsbook operators. Many states levy the tax on gross gaming revenues (GGR), an estimated measure of sportsbook profitability from gaming activity, prior to any deductions for operational expenses. Recently, the way in which promotional wagers affect GGR and the sportsbook taxable base has been a policy focus for several states.
A few states take a different approach to taxing sports betting activity. Tennessee levies a tax directly on the sports betting handle—the total amount wagered—and Illinois now charges an additional ad quantum fee per bet. The Oregon lottery granted DraftKings a monopoly for online sports betting in the state in exchange for the state receiving 51 percent of the sports betting proceeds. We convert these taxes to their approximate GGR levels for comparability with other states’ rates.
2025 Data
2024
Expand or Collapse Table
Online Sports Betting Tax Revenue by StateThe Latest Data, As of 2024
StateTax RatesTax Revenues
Arizona10.00%$45,298,943
Arkansas20.00%$7,830,998
Colorado10.00%$34,195,366
Connecticut13.75%$27,136,308
Delaware (a)50.00%$10,855,193
Illinois (b)50.00%$240,822,626
Indiana9.50%$48,808,977
Iowa6.75%$15,480,918
Kansas10.00%$13,495,279
Kentucky14.25%$41,339,332
Louisiana15.00%$67,090,425
Maine10.00%$5,849,814
Maryland15.00%$85,831,813
Massachusetts20.00%$133,102,917
Michigan8.40%$23,512,645
Nevada6.75%$34,330,515
New Hampshire51.00%$34,990,877
New Jersey14.25%$162,213,236
New York51.00%$1,072,376,830
North Carolina (c)18.00%$103,476,630
Ohio20.00%$189,490,281
Oregon51.00%$49,449,737
Pennsylvania36.00%$197,368,181
Rhode Island51.00%$18,245,730
Tennessee19.70%$97,427,676
Vermont31.70%$12,277,159
Virginia15.00%$92,654,093
West Virginia10.00%$5,743,175
Wyoming10.00%$1,542,737
District of Columbia (d)30.00%$18,150,286
TOTAL$2,890,388,697
Notes:
(a) Delaware began legal online sports betting on January 3.
(b) Illinois began 2024 with a 15% tax rate, then changed to a graduated rate from 20% to 40% on July 1.
(c) North Carolina began legal online sports betting on March 11.
(d) The District of Columbia began 2024 with a 10% tax rate, then changed to a rate of 30% on most online sports gambling on August 1.
Source: State statutes; LegalSportsReport
Data compiled by Adam Hoffer, Jacob Macumber-Rosin
Data compiled by Adam Hoffer
See Prior Analysis
Significant Changes Since January 1, 2024
Delaware began legal online sports gambling operations with a 50 percent tax rate, the 4th highest in the nation.
Missouri has established a tax rate on online sports gambling of 10 percent, with legal operations set to begin on December 1, 2025.
Illinois significantly increased the online sports gambling tax, from 15 percent to 40 percent, increasing its rank by seven positions to the 5th highest in the nation. Illinois also added a per-wager tax of up to $0.50 per wager (approximately 10 percent of GGR).
The District of Columbia increased the tax on online sports gambling from 20 to 30 percent.
New Jersey increased the tax on online sports gambling from 14.25 percent to 21.00 percent, increasing its rank by seven positions.
Louisiana increased the tax on online sports gambling from 15.0 to 21.5 percent.
Maryland increased the tax on online sports gambling from 15 to 20 percent.
Taxes are not the only burdens that gamblers and sportsbooks must bear.
Consumer access to legal betting markets is limited primarily by high barriers to entry for sports betting operators who want to offer services in the state and by limits on the geographic locations where players are allowed to place bets.
State laws and regulations erect significant barriers to entry for operators. This is often in the form of expensive licensing fees or requirements for online sportsbooks to partner with existing in-state brick-and-mortar operators. For instance, Massachusetts demands sportsbooks pay a fee of $5 million and renew that payment every five years. Sportsbooks in Pennsylvania must pay an initial fee of $10 million and a $250,000 renewal fee every five years.
New Jersey requires online sportsbook operators to partner with a brick-and-mortar racetrack or casino licensed in the state, while Ohio offers online sportsbooks the option to partner with a professional sports organization approved by the Casino Control Commission to offer mobile sports betting.
Other states require a partnership with the state lottery commission or grant control of online sports betting markets to the state lottery commission directly. Online gaming operators in Connecticut must partner with an approved master gaming operator to legally offer services. Montana monopolized all sports betting under the Montana Lottery Commission.
Whether via direct control, like in Montana, or an exclusive contract with a private operator, like in New Hampshire, states that grant a monopoly to one provider of sports betting services establish an insurmountable barrier to entry for other providers. These anticompetitive practices limit consumers’ options, which is likely to also limit the revenues states generate from sports betting taxes and economic growth from the gaming industry.
Several states also restrict where players are allowed to gamble online. In New Mexico, North Dakota, and Wisconsin, consumers are only allowed to place bets from tribal casinos. South Dakota gamblers may place bets in tribal casinos or in licensed casinos in the city of Deadwood. Mississippi and Montana only allow consumers to place bets when physically present at retail casinos or state-operated facilities.
Online wagers are treated differently from other wagers in certain states. Arizona, Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, and the District of Columbia tax online wagers more heavily than retail (in-person) wagers.
Establishing and taxing a legal sports betting market has been quite lucrative for states. Sports betting taxes brought in over $2.8 billion for states across the country. New York received by far the most at over $1 billion, followed by Illinois with over $240 million.
The market for sports betting will likely continue to grow substantially as more states allow legal operations or expand existing operations to online services. As the tax baseThe tax base is the total amount of income, property, assets, consumption, transactions, or other economic activity subject to taxation by a tax authority. A narrow tax base is non-neutral and inefficient. A broad tax base reduces tax administration costs and allows more revenue to be raised at lower rates. grows, tax policy design becomes increasingly important.
Optimal sports betting tax design would ensure that rates are low enough to bring consumers into legal, regulated markets rather than gambling illicitly. Restrictions on where consumers are allowed to gamble, or limits on their choices from barriers to entry like exorbitant licensure or monopoly grants, are also likely to push consumers into black markets. Illicit gambling markets also tend to be more predatory and have fewer protections for consumers, especially problem gamblers, so this aligns with public health goals as well.
Tax revenues and public benefits from legal sports gambling may be undermined by the recent change to the treatment of gambling income for federal income taxes. With only a portion of gambling losses now deductible, the unequal tax treatment threatens to drive much gambling activity to other countries or illicit markets that are not so unfairly burdened.
Stay informed on the tax policies impacting you.Subscribe to get insights from our trusted experts delivered straight to your inbox.
Subscribe
Share this article
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Email
Previous Versions
DataSeptember 17, 2024September 15, 2025
Online Sports Betting Taxes by State, 20243 min read
All Related Articles
BlogApril 17, 2025May 21, 2025
Localities Opt Out of Georgia’s New Homestead Tax ExemptionPolicymakers may consider a broader, more comprehensive property tax reform that creates a uniform system with effective levy limits to prevent unauthorized increases in property tax revenues and, in most cases, property tax bills.
4 min read
BlogMarch 26, 2025April 16, 2025
Indiana Mulls Local Income and Property Tax ReformsThis legislative session, local taxes are a major topic of debate in Indiana. Although the state’s property tax system is already nationally competitive, dramatic increases in assessed values have created discontent in recent years.
8 min read
BlogMarch 10, 2025March 11, 2025
Minnesota Legislation Would Ease Burdens for Business TravelersA recent proposal in Minnesota exempting certain nonresident workers from having to file and pay income taxes would reduce compliance costs for business travelers and their employers at limited cost to the state.
4 min read
TopicsBusiness TaxesDataExcise TaxesIndividual and Consumption Taxes
TagsTags:Lottery | Gambling | Sports Betting TaxesState Tax Trends
LocationsLocations:AlabamaAlaskaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareFloridaGeorgiaHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaStateTennesseeTexasThe District of ColumbiaUnited StatesUtahVermontVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyoming
Authors
ExpertAdam HofferDirector of Excise Tax Policy
ExpertJacob Macumber-RosinExcise Tax Policy Analyst
Stay informed on the tax policies impacting you.
Subscribe
About
Since 1937, our principled research, insightful analysis, and engaged experts have informed smarter tax policy in the U.S. and internationally. For over 80 years, our mission has remained the same: to improve lives through tax policies that lead to greater economic growth and opportunity.
Donate
As a nonprofit, we depend on the generosity of individuals like you.
Careers
Contact Us
1325 G St NW, Suite 950
Washington, DC 20005
Copyright Tax Foundation 2025
Copyright Notice
Privacy Policy
