Raw: [A new bill in Oklahoma, HB 3983, could become a template for taxing moist snuff tobacco (MST) by weight rather than ad valorem.]
Skip to content
US
Europe
EN
Subscribe
Donate
Research
Research Areas
Federal TaxState TaxGlobal TaxEU Tax
All ResearchMeet Our Experts
Featured Projects
Tariff Tracker2026 Tax CalculatorFederal Tax ModelingState Tax Competitiveness IndexInternational Tax Competitiveness IndexEuropean Tax Policy ScorecardState Reforms for Mobility and ModernizationGrowth and Opportunity Tax Plan
Featured Issues
Tariffs & TradeOne Big Beautiful Bill ActProperty TaxesDebt & DeficitsState Tax TrendsWealth TaxesTaxes on Savers & InvestorsGlobal Tax DealCost Recovery
Latest Research
How Well Do Carbon Taxes Match Their Promise? Evidence from 202361 min read
Experts Data
Data Areas
Federal TaxState TaxGlobal TaxEU Tax
All DataMeet Our Experts
Featured Projects
Facts & Figures: How Does Your State Compare?Federal Income Tax Brackets2026 Tax CalculatorWho Pays Federal Income TaxesFederal Economic Data DashboardState and Local Tax BurdensCorporate Tax Rates Around the WorldSources of Government Revenue in the OECD
Featured Issues
State Data ExplorerCountry Data ExplorerState Tax MapsEuropean Tax Maps
Latest Data
Digital Services Taxes in Europe, 20265 min read
Blog & Commentary
Tax Policy BlogSee All TestimonySee All Op-edsThe Deduction PodcastMeet Our Experts
Latest Blog Post
Minnesota Should Learn from Europe: Wealth Taxes Are a Failed Experiment6 min read
Latest Testimony
Testimony: A High-Earner Surtax Would Hurt Rhode Island’s Small Businesses
Latest Op-ed
No, Tariffs Are Not Strengthening the Economy
Education
Tax Terms GlossaryExplainer VideosThe Short Form BlogOur Principles
PrimersLessonsLegislative Courses
Tax Foundation UniversityState Tax Policy Boot Camp
Featured Resources
The Three Basic Tax TypesNot All Taxes Are Created EqualHistory of Taxes10 Common Tax Myths, DebunkedA Carbon Tax, ExplainedCommon Tax Questions, Answered
Featured Term
Tax Incidence
Events About Us
About UsOur PrinciplesContact Us
Staff
Meet Our TeamMeet Our ExpertsMeet Our Board
Careers
Job OpeningsInternships
Support Our Work
Donate TodayWays to GiveDonor FAQPlanned Giving
Start typing to search…
Home • Blog • Louisiana and Oklahoma Propose a More Principled Tax on Moist Snuff Tobacco
Louisiana and Oklahoma Propose a More Principled Tax on Moist Snuff TobaccoMay 8, 2026May 8, 20264 min readBy: Adam Hoffer, Jacob Macumber-Rosin
An amended bill in Louisiana, HB 782, would change the taxA tax is a mandatory payment or charge collected by local, state, and national governments from individuals or businesses to cover the costs of general government services, goods, and activities. rate on moist snuff tobacco (MST) from 20 percent of the wholesale price to 59 cents per ounce. Similarly, a new bill in Oklahoma, HB 3983, would convert the state’s 60 percent wholesale tax to a specific weight-based tax of $1.72 per ounce.
Simple, direct taxes work best for non-cigarette tobacco products. A weight-based tax for MST ensures neutral taxation across products and is less volatile because revenue doesn’t fluctuate with market prices.
Alternative nicotine products present a challenging case for tax policy. Historically, the best excise taxes on harm-generating products are the ones that specifically target the harm-causing element. This allows market participants to internalize the external harm into their decision-making. Taxes on hard alcohol, for example, increase based on alcohol content or proof gallon to reflect the greater harms from the additional alcohol. Similarly, a tax placed on carbon emissions can price in external damages from pollution and climate change into energy consumption and production decisions.
Alternative tobacco products don’t create similar kinds of external costs, nor is there a clear ingredient in these products that can be targeted with an excise taxAn excise tax is a tax imposed on a specific good or activity. Excise taxes are commonly levied on cigarettes, alcoholic beverages, soda, gasoline, insurance premiums, amusement activities, and betting, and typically make up a relatively small and volatile portion of state and local and, to a lesser extent, federal tax collections.. Nicotine does not directly create external harm. Thus, without a target ingredient to tax, policymakers are forced to use a broader base determined by consumption, typically with several different tax rates based on product and category.
In this scenario, quantity-based specific taxes are also better than price-based ad valorem taxes at aligning the tax baseThe tax base is the total amount of income, property, assets, consumption, transactions, or other economic activity subject to taxation by a tax authority. A narrow tax base is non-neutral and inefficient. A broad tax base reduces tax administration costs and allows more revenue to be raised at lower rates. to the tax’s purpose. For nicotine products, the number of cigarettes smoked or the amount of vapor inhaled has a much clearer connection to any harm caused by this consumption than the retail sales price of the products. Specific taxation is often simpler because the tax can be calculated based on weight, volume, or amount instead of an estimated value.
Table 1. Proposed Tax Structure for Alternative Nicotine Products
ProductTax Type
Vapor ProductsSpecific per milliliter
Heated TobaccoSpecific per ounce
Nicotine PouchesSpecific per ounce
Moist Snuff and SnusSpecific per ounce
Taxing products by weight eliminates disparities among differently priced products. If a 1.2-ounce can of snuff carries a $5.00 wholesale price, Oklahoma would charge $3.00 in tax. If a discount product enters the market that is the identical size as the original can, but half the wholesale price, $2.50, the state would only charge $1.50 in tax, collecting half of the revenue for the same amount of snuff. A weight-based tax would charge both products the same tax—$2.06 under HB 3983.
Taxing based on price rather than quantity incentivizes consumers to purchase lower-priced products to reduce their tax burden. In addition to possible concerns with driving consumers down the quality ladder toward cheaper products, this incentive is likely to drive revenue decline over time as consumers switch to discounted products.
However, a specific tax rate that does not change would be subject to its own revenue decline over time as the currency is debased. As the real value of $1.72 is diminished, the real value of the tax collections will diminish as well.
Nearly half of states already use a weight-based tax for MST. The per-weight rates range from only $0.02 per 1.2-ounce package of snuff in Alabama to $3.54 per ounce in Maine. Oklahoma HB 3983’s $1.72 per ounce tax would be the fifth-highest weight-based MST tax in the country and would be significantly above the national average of states that tax MST by weight, $1.18 per ounce.
The Oklahoma Legislature’s Fiscal Analysis of the change does not estimate any impact on the overall amount of revenue the state receives, but this change would make those collections significantly more principled. HB 3983’s weight-based tax would provide more stable revenues, levy a more neutral burden, and be simpler and easier for consumers to understand.
Principled taxation should be the goal of policymakers everywhere. Louisiana HB 782 and Oklahoma HB 3983 would make these states’ MST tax regimes an example for other states to follow.
Stay informed on the tax policies impacting you.Subscribe to get insights from our trusted experts delivered straight to your inbox.
Subscribe
Share this article
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Email
About the Authors
ExpertAdam HofferDirector of Excise Tax Policy
Adam Hoffer is the Director of Excise Tax Policy at the Tax Foundation. Dr. Hoffer earned his PhD in Economics from West Virginia University and his undergraduate degree from Washington & Jefferson College.
ExpertJacob Macumber-RosinExcise Tax Policy Analyst
Jacob Macumber-Rosin is an Excise Tax Policy Analyst with the Tax Foundation. Jacob holds a BS in economics (politics and the economy) as well as a BS in civic and economic thought and leadership from Arizona State University.
All Related Articles
ResearchOctober 30, 2025March 16, 2026
2026 State Tax Competitiveness IndexThe State Tax Competitiveness Index enables policymakers, taxpayers, and business leaders to gauge how their states’ tax systems compare. While there are many ways to show how much state governments collect in taxes, the Index evaluates how well states structure their tax systems and provides a road map for improvement.
122 min read
DataSeptember 2, 2025August 29, 2025
Gas Taxes by State, 2025California levies the highest tax on gasoline at 70.9 cents per gallon (cpg), followed by Illinois at 66.4 cpg and Washington at 59.0 cpg.
8 min read
DataAugust 5, 2025August 5, 2025
Cigarette Taxes and Cigarette Smuggling by State, 2023Growing cigarette tax levels and differentials have made cigarette smuggling both a national problem and a lucrative criminal enterprise.
6 min read
TopicsCigarette and Tobacco TaxesExcise TaxesIndividual and Consumption TaxesTax administration
TagsTags:E-Cigarette and Vaping Taxes
LocationsLocations:Oklahoma
Authors
ExpertAdam HofferDirector of Excise Tax Policy
ExpertJacob Macumber-RosinExcise Tax Policy Analyst
Stay informed on the tax policies impacting you.
Subscribe
About
Since 1937, our principled research, insightful analysis, and engaged experts have informed smarter tax policy in the U.S. and internationally. For over 80 years, our mission has remained the same: to improve lives through tax policies that lead to greater economic growth and opportunity.
Donate
As a nonprofit, we depend on the generosity of individuals like you.
Careers
Contact Us
1325 G St NW, Suite 950
Washington, DC 20005
Copyright Tax Foundation 2026
Copyright Notice
Privacy Policy
